Sheets created in class in 25 minutes in order to focus on aspects of context, language and plot devices in TKAM.
Category Archives: mockingbird
Again, a PowerPoint for students to refer to after a lesson. In this case an essay question from May 2014 from the Edexcel IGCSE Literature paper.
… in TKAM?
When answering this type of question, popular in the Edexcel IGCSE students might want to use these steps as a guide:
1: There is no right answer, but you must have enough material in your chosen character to establish a good, detailed and broad response in order to show, at least, “thorough” knowledge as required to attain 19-24/30.
2: If a character is truly memorable that is because the writer wished the readers to remember that character. Bear this in mind. The character must embody something about the messages which the writer wishes to impart. If you are not sure about the underlying themes or philosophies being discussed, then this is a tricky essay to write well.
3: This essay is not a straightforward character essay. Yes you will need to explore their character, but also explain what it is that makes them memorable.
4: Any character is a construct. Try not to write as though they are real, autonomous characters who think for themselves. They don’t. They have been created in a certain way to convey a certain purpose. Try to show you understand this…
With this in mind, students have just been writing a response to this question based on TKAM in a past IGCSE Lit paper.
I will show an outline plan here for 2 characters: Atticus and Bob Ewell…
Atticus: role- educator, personification of justice, father. Lee is writing to point up the parlous state of bigotry and justice in the South in the 30s. She is intending her writing to reflect the mood of the late 50s and early 60s. This Atticus is needed to be memorable since he embodies the role of the “righteous”…
Here are some ideas:
a: For Atticus to teach the children the fundamental character traits needed to deliver a better world he needs to be put into a series of “lessons”. Throughout part 1 there are a number of these, from stopping the playing of the Radley-game to the lesson in courage which bis Mrs Dubose. Choose wisely and explore a couple to develop the idea that both the children and the reader need to be educated before the trial starts to ensure that the lessons are fully learned.
b: The trial is the centre piece of Part 2 and the lesson here is about justice and the idea that there is a natural justice which is not always represented by the justice delivered by a society which has formulated laws to reinforce the status quo within that society. Atticus is not necessarily free of the taint of racism, but he is clearly embodying the idea that what is just should be fought for, whatever the odds. This section can be used for what Lee evidently intended to be the set piece – his summing-up speech. This speech is so clearly an attack on the complacency of a white hierarchy that it becomes, almost verbatim, the centrepiece of Gregory Peck’s Atticus on film – a depiction of the novel which is so Atticus centered that it tends to slew our recollection of the novel. Clearly we are meant to remember this speech if little else!
c: Atticus is self-effacing yet has deep courage. It is no accident that two passages complement each other in this text: the shooting of Tim Johnson and the threatening second mob scene. In both Atticus is depicted as the calm “ever fixed mark” at the centre of a tempest. Highly memorable scenes which serve to stress the idea of justice being immovable at the centre of a wild world.
d: As a father Atticus is a model – almost too good to be true. He is a single parent who manages to bring up his children in an era of poverty and yet manages to teach them about fairness, courage and honesty despite the challenges he faces. You can choose any of his interventions, but cast an eye to the structure of the novel. Jem is useful. We recall how he is “disappointed” in Atticus early in the story, and becomes hero-struck during the trial, hanging on every word. This book is a bildungsroman. Atticus is particularly memorable because it is his interactions with the children which show the pair develop from the innocence of the opening pages to the worldly experience of the end of the novel. He is memorable because Lee despite Atticus’ input, it is the children who seem to make this journey for themselves.
I use Bob briefly to show how one can approach another character, with much less input on the pages of the book.
a: He embodies Lee’s message that despite social adversity, a good human does not fall below a certain standard of behviour. She needs her readers to recognise this and to take this message away from their reading.
b: His character is memorable because of those to which he stands in apposition. The main difference can be found in the description of his home compared with that of the poor black community. Here setting meets character – Bob’s home is Bob. It is destroyed by his selfish obsession with his own pleasure and his general laziness and careless cruelty. His character is set into by Mayella and her pathetic attempts to bring beauty and colour into the home. This makes his savage assault on her, possibly the mother of some of his children, all the more horrific.
c: He opposes Atticus in the trial and is all Atticus is not. He shows scant respect for the proceedings and an arrogance born of the colour of his skin seems to lead him to ever greater excess of behaviour. He is memorable by comparison, and he does not come out of the comparison well.
d: He seems to embody a cowardly, disreputable white bigot of a kind which Lee wants to hold to account. In a book full of racism, hypocrisy and scant regard for the dignity of those worse off, the best one can say about Ewell is that he is not a hypocrite, unlike the fine Maycomb ladies. He is shown to be a shallow and cowardly being from the moment Burris is scornful (children in this book are a direct product and reflection of the mores of their parents) and cruel to Miss Caroline to the final murderous attack on the children. He acts when drunk and in the comfort of a protective group of hangers on.
We should remember Bob just as much as we remember Atticus – he is the figure against which we are being warned. Men like him should be challenged, says Lee. He has to be memorable if the story is to have any lasting purpose.
Sound files of two lessons with year 11 discussing aspects of TKAM and MAAN.
courage in MAAN, suffering in TKAM, Boo Radley, friendship in MAAN…
A few boys missed these lessons and these are for them to catch up from as study leave begins… help yourselves and feel free to use the reply thread to begin a conversation.
A response to the 2016 January Edexcel IGCSE exam. NOT a model essay: Find your own quotations – I have tried to point out the way!
Suffering covers a wide range of ideas and I would begin here by identifying my key thought areas:
- Suffering due to abject poverty
- Suffering due to prejudice
- Physical suffering
- Mental suffering
Once this is done, we can look more closely at each area.
Poverty drives this novel from the very opening and the firsr few chapters, focused on early school days are a good source for this. Another area I would use is the description of the Ewell home which is found during the trial in chapter 18. The depression has hit the South hard as it was struggling to cope with the after-effects of the civil war. Southerners took great pride in their heritage , but even now the energy is running out – “Maycomb … was a tired old town”. The description of the town – the courthouse with the roof which “sagged” and the dirt street which turn to thick mud suggest a town on its last legs. even the mules are”bony”. At school the poverty is thrown into sharp contrast with Miss Caroline’s dress (which represents the Stripes of the Stars and Stripes – then still seen as the flag of the North). Individuals are singled out for attention – Walter with no food but the pride and dignity to refuse the loan to buy some since he can’t repay it. There is nothing without suffering in a society in which food is used as payment for actions – however picturesque or heartwarming it might be. This is a world in which poverty has removed dignity from so many and created alarming levels of suffering which the young Scout does not really see. The Cunninghams are dignified in their suffering. The Ewells are not. Burris hurls abuse at his “slut” of a teacher and leaves school on day 1 each year – presumably to do nothing since the description of the home does not suggest a need to help on the family farm. The Ewell household is suffering at the very bottom of society and seemingly is incapable or unwilling to do anything about it.
Their home by the dump has no running water, no panes in the windows and a general air of poverty that would rival that seen by Mrs Merryweather’s beloved Mrunas. Bob is in receipt of financial help from the state but chooses to drink it all away and leaves the care of the children to Mayella. She is helpless – she tries to make the place more beautiful with geraniums, but is helpless. The food is scavenged and the atmosphere threatening. Poverty has reduced this family to a level of suffering which is painful to behold. Sadly, the theme of racist bigotry is so strong in this house that we do not see the suffering as clearly as we should – it does not excuse any of the actions of Mayella, but it explains why she longs for the company of Tom, even if her moral compass is rendered non-existant by the threats and abuse of her father. We should notice that the suffering caused by her father with its implied sexual abuse causes her to behave as she does and any suffering she feels as she lies on the witness stand derives neatly from this same source. This suffering shows neatly the hypocrisy rife in the town, where even Atticus can refer to the Ewells as white trash and all suggest that they occupy a lower social level than the Blacks. In that society, suffering is all too clear, but it is interesting to note that one of the purposes of the scene in the church is to highlight a community pulling together to help each other out of the suffering caused by poverty and bigotry.
Such prejudicial suffering must be highlighted by the treatment of Tom. He and his family suffer for racist prejudice. It is clear he is innocent of the crime, yet he is convicted. Atticus knows this is to be the case and all with an understanding of the racial attitudes of the deep South know it too. As a first person narrator, Scout cannot know what took place in the jail prior to his escape bid (if such it was), and this is not touched upon. We assume that there was no let up there. His family suffer the grief of his death and the continued harassment of Bob “chunking” on Helen. Link Deas performs a small act of Heroism to save her from this suffering, but no amount of slightly description of the black homes with their “pale smoke rising from the chimneys and doorways glowing amber from the fires inside” and the “delicious smells” coming from them can hide the level of suffering of this community – ignored by the town women who fret about the Mrunas while allowing such abject conditions to exist within their own town.
Physical suffering is used, as much else in this text, as an educative process for the children and is best shown through Mrs Dubose. Her suffering -in a sense futile since it will not alleviate death – is used to teach Jem true courage. The description of her home and her physical features -a beautifully written Gothic interlude- show her as a grotesque and terrifying old woman – “the corners of her mouth glistened with wet, which inched like a glacier down the deep grooves enclosing her chin” – but one in much pain from her attempt to clean her body prior to death. Again, Scout is such an unreliable narrator that the reader is fixed on her cruelty and her unkind mouth, rather than on her suffering. Once the section is complete, the reader learns, along with the children, what this was about. “Courage is not a man with a gun in his hand”, says Atticus, “it’s when you know you’re licked before you begin but you begin anyway”. The suffering of Mrs Dubose is an apt illustration of this and concludes part one of the book. The same message will be stressed in part two through the medium of Tom’s trial.
My final section might consider the mental torment suffered by Boo and you can look at another post to flesh out ideas for this: Hey Boo!
A few thoughts about the presentation of Boo Radley as a result of an email from an absent student….
How is Boo Radley presented?
1: Establish appearance and reality. IN a novel where so much is recounted through the eyes of a highly subjective and unreliable narrator, it is important to separate the known unknowns from the unknown knowns and the known knowns…
What are we told that may not be true – the known unknowns
- Boo is a wild man chained to a bed eating squirrels – all a figment of Jem’s overactive Gothic imagination. A diet of ghost stories has left Jem with ample time to develop his imaginary world.
- This is casually referred to inChapter 4 with Walter who adds his own little piece of gossip – the “pizened” pecans
- The story of the stabbing and subsequent incarceration as told by Stephanie Crawford is another unsubstantiated slur. As a result of some unexplained misdeed it is possible that Boo was locked in the basement of the jail for an indeterminate time – enough to thoroughly frighten a sensitive character and to make it increasingly likely that they would wish to stay indoors….
- He becomes the central figure of all the children’s games, with Dill particularly intrigued by him. He is central to the cliffhanger which ends chapter 4 when “someone inside was laughing” following Scout’s arrival inside the tyre. This is meant to be chilling.
So if the children and Miss Stephanie create an image of Boo to chill the blood, what are the unknown knowns and the known knowns?
- Boo was in trouble as a youth and was not sent away to the industrial and so missed out on the “best secondary education in the state”. The trouble owed more to being a teenager than being a criminal but broke some of the unwritten “codes of society”.
- His father seems cruel and unthinking in relation to his treatment of Boo.
- Nobody has seen him for many years, yet Atticus seems utterly unfazed at the end of the novel- possibly he is not too much of a stranger after all to the older generation.
- When the children break into the Radley garden it is Boo’s hand which mends the jeans sewed up “all crooked”.
- It must be Boo who provides Scout with a blanket during the fire
- It must be Boo who provides the gifts in the knot hole, and Mr Radley fills it to spite him, not the children.
- Boo saves the children’s lives and richly deserves Atticus’ thanks
- He is subject to discrimination in all the tales told by the likes of Miss Stephanie and allows Atticus to show his innate fairness.
So much, so good…
Boo is very much a key part of the action in the early part of the novel – when the children are at their most impressionable, and reemerges at the end, though he is not part of the plot around the trial and the injustice given to Tom Robinson. This seems right because he lies completely outside society and has a different function. He is a victim of prejudice, just a certainly as Tom, but not because of colour, rather due to the hypocritical actions of the gossips around town who stringently enforce their “codes” – the ones that Mayella will break, and do not tolerate variance from the norm. He has paid the penalty for breaking societies codes, but this has not made him into a bad person. Everything he does is to benefit society – in the form of what Lee refers to as “his children” when she finally gets to stand on his porch in the wonderful coda of the book when the narrative slips into an omniscient third person description of the story from Boo’s perspective.
Despite the initial appearances drawn up by Jem and the others, he is a figure of good – a real “mockingbird” untouched by the hypocrisies of “polite” society. He is fearless in defence of right and lives to care for the children. Whether it is stretching things to see him as a second Atticus as a result of this, I am not sure, but thought his actions and motives are different, he certainly embodies many of Atticus’ most pungent character traits:
It is a sin to kill a mockingbird. It is also wrong, as Jem points out to torture a defenceless bug. Boo is both of these things. A real force for good who goes unobserved at the centre of society without being part of society. His taunting by the children may well have been cruel, as Atticus points out, but it helped him to develop a relationship with the children which would ultimately save their lives. Boo flits ghost- like through the book and his final description as he stands in the bedroom: “his face was as white as his hands…is grey eyes were so colourless, I thought he was blind…His hair was dead an thin… feathery on top of his head” is a far cry from Jem’s image of blooodstained hands and other savagery. It is fitting that Scout walks him home – he does not seem to be of the same world as the rest of the characters of the book. Indeed, the book that Atticus reads Scout at the end of the novel could be his autobiography – The Grey Ghost.
Year 11, please find your last essays, fully critiqued and annotated. You should now go back into the text of your essay and think about your own improvements. Remember that revision is not about passive reading!
The essays are on the presntation of Atticus and the Presentation of Racism – taken from past papers.